\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

never forget: Kasparov tried to redpill us on the CQ

The New Chronology is a pseudohistorical theory which argues...
deus vult
  12/29/17
spin, ratfucks
THE NOTORIOUS SIX. FOOT. THREE.
  12/29/17
Fischer said he had an IQ 40-50x higher than Kasparov, whom ...
deus vult
  12/29/17
spin, ratfucks
THE NOTORIOUS SIX. FOOT. THREE.
  12/29/17
180
(gepensioneerd)
  01/12/18
"I object to being called a chess genius because I cons...
deus vult
  01/12/18
...
deus vult
  01/12/18
that theory is nonsense. For one thing, how the fuck do...
spaceporn2525
  01/12/18
Date: January 12th, 2018 11:43 AM Author: spaceporn2525 ...
Morning In America
  01/12/18
? never try to reconcile anything with the assumption c...
deus vult
  01/12/18
hahahaha spit out my drink. credited point, brother. credit...
spaceporn2525
  01/12/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 29th, 2017 4:06 AM
Author: deus vult (from constantinople to the stars)

The New Chronology is a pseudohistorical theory which argues that the conventional chronology of Middle Eastern and European history is fundamentally flawed, and that events attributed to the civilizations of the Roman Empire, Ancient Greece and Ancient Egypt actually occurred during the Middle Ages, more than a thousand years later. The central concepts of the New Chronology are derived from the ideas of Russian scholar Nikolai Morozov (18541946),[1] although work by French scholar Jean Hardouin (16461729) can be viewed as an earlier predecessor.[2] However, the New Chronology is most commonly associated with Russian mathematician Anatoly Fomenko (born 1945), although published works on the subject are actually a collaboration between Fomenko and several other mathematicians. The concept is most fully explained in History: Fiction or Science?, originally published in Russian.

Fomenko's historical ideas have been universally rejected by mainstream scholars, who brand them as pseudoscience,[34] but were popularized by former world chess champion Garry Kasparov.[35][36][37] Billington writes that the theory "might have quietly blown away in the wind tunnels of academia" if not for Kasparov's writing in support of it



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3843171&forum_id=2#35032515)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 29th, 2017 4:08 AM
Author: THE NOTORIOUS SIX. FOOT. THREE.

spin, ratfucks

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3843171&forum_id=2#35032521)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 29th, 2017 4:10 AM
Author: deus vult (from constantinople to the stars)

Fischer said he had an IQ 40-50x higher than Kasparov, whom he considered a mere chessNUT.

im inclined to agree

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3843171&forum_id=2#35032539)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 29th, 2017 4:14 AM
Author: THE NOTORIOUS SIX. FOOT. THREE.

spin, ratfucks

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3843171&forum_id=2#35032558)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 12th, 2018 11:44 AM
Author: (gepensioneerd)

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3843171&forum_id=2#35139759)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 12th, 2018 4:26 PM
Author: deus vult (from constantinople to the stars)

"I object to being called a chess genius because I consider myself to be an all around genius who just happens to play chess, which is rather different. A piece of garbage like Kasparov might be called a chess genius, but he's like an idiot savant. Outside of chess he knows nothing"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3843171&forum_id=2#35142190)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 12th, 2018 11:42 AM
Author: deus vult (from constantinople to the stars)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3843171&forum_id=2#35139747)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 12th, 2018 11:43 AM
Author: spaceporn2525

that theory is nonsense.

For one thing, how the fuck do you reconcile it with accurate recordkeeping from chinkland?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3843171&forum_id=2#35139754)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 12th, 2018 11:46 AM
Author: Morning In America

Date: January 12th, 2018 11:43 AM

Author: spaceporn2525

that theory is nonsense.

For one thing, how the fuck do you reconcile it with accurate recordkeeping from chinkland?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3843171&forum_id=2#35139754)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3843171&forum_id=2#35139766)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 12th, 2018 11:46 AM
Author: deus vult (from constantinople to the stars)

?

never try to reconcile anything with the assumption chinese people have honest paperwork

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3843171&forum_id=2#35139769)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 12th, 2018 11:47 AM
Author: spaceporn2525

hahahaha spit out my drink. credited point, brother. credited point.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3843171&forum_id=2#35139778)